• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Bar Exam Toolbox®

Get the tools you need for bar exam success

  • I Failed!
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
    • Writing Help: Essays/PT
    • MBE Help
    • Self-Study Program
    • Options – California
    • Options – UBE
  • Bar Exam 101
  • About
  • Blog
  • Podcast
  • Login

How to Approach Criminal Procedure Questions on the MBE

September 16, 2019 By Natalie Holzaepfel Leave a Comment

How to Approach Criminal Procedure Questions on the MBEWhen bar exam season is in full swing, you spend countless waking hours mulling over multiple choice questions for the Multistate Bar Exam. And for good reason. The questions are notoriously difficult, and you have to get a passing score on the MBE in your jurisdiction to be admitted to the bar. The MBE tests Civil Procedure, Constitutional Law, Contracts, Evidence, Real Property, Torts, and Criminal Law & Procedure.

Although the bar examiners have lumped Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure into one category, these question types are distinct and require their own approaches. While you may approach a Criminal Law question in a similar manner to a Torts question, Criminal Procedure questions are more akin to a Constitutional Law or Civil Procedure analysis.

Of the 175 scored questions on the MBE, 25 of those questions fall into the Criminal Law & Procedure category. Of those 25 questions, 12-13 of them will cover Criminal Procedure, and we can break this down even further. The 12-13 Criminal Procedure questions will cover a number of topics, including search and seizure, the exclusionary rule, right to counsel, and confessions and privileges.

Even though Criminal Procedure is a broad topic, you can still adopt an overarching approach to answer these questions. This article provides tips on how to develop that overarching approach and how to tackle those tricky search and seizure questions.

1. Your Overarching Approach to MBE Criminal Procedure Questions

We’ve stated this before when discussing how to tackle other MBE questions, but we’ll say it here again: approach MBE questions, including Criminal Procedure questions, in the same way you would an essay. That means identifying the issue, honing in on the rule, applying the rule to the facts, and drawing a conclusion even before you hit the answer choices.

In Criminal Procedure questions, as you’ll likely find in Constitutional Law questions, one of the most difficult parts is narrowing in on the specific issue that the question is meant to test you on. Luckily, in Criminal Procedure questions, you can often use the call of the question for guidance. For example, some Criminal Procedure questions have asked:

  • Under what circumstances, if any, may the grand jury compel production of the diary over the suspect’s assertion of his Fifth Amendment privilege?
  • How should the trial judge instruct the jury regarding the burden of proof on the issue of consent?

Once you’ve identified the issue, isolate the even narrower issue being tested, and identify the corresponding rule. This will become easier as you become more familiar with and memorize the rules in this subject area. Once you’ve done this, the application part of your analysis becomes easy.

Finally, before you read the answer choices, draw your own conclusion. Doing this will make sure you don’t get flustered when you see what appears to be a compelling answer choice. Stick with your initial conclusion, select the answer, and then move on to the next question.

2. Tackling the Search and Seizure Questions on the MBE

Search and seizure questions form a significant part of the Criminal Procedure MBE questions you’ll encounter on exam day. Because of this, knowing the law in this area can help you bump up your MBE score.

Let’s start by talking about your approach for the seizure of a person. First, determine if there even is a seizure. A seizure occurs when a reasonable person would feel that he or she is not free to leave or terminate the encounter. Second, determine the type of seizure: arrest, Terry stop, or automobile stop. Based on the type of stop, you’ll need to apply the relevant rules. Remember that for arrests, an arrest may occur without a warrant unless the arrest takes place at the defendant’s home. For warrantless arrests, police need probable cause (trustworthy facts that lead a reasonable person to believe a crime has occurred). Terry stops, also known as investigatory detention, require reasonable suspicion of illegal activity. Officers can frisk the detained person for weapons only if the officer has a reason to believe the detained person is armed and dangerous. Finally, officers may stop an automobile with only reasonable suspicion.

If you’re tackling an evidentiary search and seizure question, you’ll take a slightly different approach. First, ask yourself who seized the evidence; remember, the Fourth Amendment applies only if the government seized the evidence. Second, determine if the defendant had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the area searched. Next, assess whether there was a valid warrant. A valid warrant requires probable cause; absent probable cause, determine if the good faith exception otherwise applies.

Finally, if there is no valid warrant, run through the key warrant exceptions: search incident to a lawful arrest; the automobile exception; plain view; consent; Terry stop and frisk; and hot pursuit. To successfully answer evidentiary search and seizure questions, make sure you’ve got these exceptions down.

Remember: Practice Makes Perfect

Although the MBE can be daunting, following a structured approach to tackling the MBE questions will ensure that you can handle them come exam day. And when it comes to the MBE, practice makes perfect.


Ready to pass the bar exam? Get the support and accountability you need with personalized one-on-one bar exam tutoring or one of our economical courses and workshops. We're here to help!


 

About Natalie Holzaepfel

Natalie is passionate about the law and recently founded a startup, Aliro Immigration, to increase access to immigration services. Prior to her startup, Natalie worked in New York as a white collar defense and internal investigations associate at Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton and in California at Perkins Coie. Natalie also clerked for Judge J. Clifford Wallace of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and for Judge James G. Carr of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio.

While attending The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law, Natalie served as a managing editor of the Ohio State Law Journal, interned in the Education Section of the Office of the Ohio Attorney General, and worked in the General Counsel’s Office at the Department of Housing and Urban Development. She also was a judicial extern to Judge Jeffrey Sutton of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Let us know you are not a spammer! * Time limit is exhausted. Please reload CAPTCHA.

Primary Sidebar

  • Podcast
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter

About Us

Want to pass the bar exam? Of course you do! We’re here to help. You’ll find lots of helpful free content at Bar Exam 101, in the Bar Exam Resource Hub, and on the Bar Exam Toolbox podcast. For more hands-on help, take a look at our courses and workshops and bar exam tutoring options. Please get in touch with any questions!

COVID-19 Updates

Please visit the COVID-19 updates page for the latest news on bar exam postponements.

Recent Posts

I Failed the Bar Exam. Should I Wait Until After the Covid-19 Pandemic to Re-Sit?

Should I Wait Until After the Covid-19 Pandemic to Re-Sit if I failed the Bar Exam?

As 2020 closed and perhaps the most bizarre and uncertain bar exam season comes to an end, we are now faced with the reality of bar exam … [Read More...] about Should I Wait Until After the Covid-19 Pandemic to Re-Sit if I failed the Bar Exam?

Podcast Episode 117: Listen and Learn — Due Process and Equal Protection (Con Law)

Welcome back to the Bar Exam Toolbox podcast! In this week's episode, as part of our "Listen and Learn" series, we're talking about an important area … [Read More...] about Podcast Episode 117: Listen and Learn — Due Process and Equal Protection (Con Law)

Podcast Episode 116: California Bar Exam Results Are Out! What’s Next If You Didn’t Pass?

Welcome back to the Bar Exam Toolbox podcast! Results from the latest California bar exam have just come out, and there's not a lot of time to prepare … [Read More...] about Podcast Episode 116: California Bar Exam Results Are Out! What’s Next If You Didn’t Pass?

Podcast Episode 115: Listen and Learn — Dying Declaration vs. Excited Utterance

Welcome back to the Bar Exam Toolbox podcast! In episode 101 we covered two hearsay exceptions, namely present sense impression and state of mind. … [Read More...] about Podcast Episode 115: Listen and Learn — Dying Declaration vs. Excited Utterance

Diploma Privilege During the COVID-19 Crisis

Diploma Privilege During the COVID-19 Crisis

Since the start of the COVID-19 crisis, the bar exam has been in flux. By the time that you are reading this post, many states have already … [Read More...] about Diploma Privilege During the COVID-19 Crisis

Need to Pass the Bar Exam?

Sign up for our free weekly email with useful tips!

Footer

  • Podcast
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • I Failed!
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Bar Exam 101
  • About
  • Blog
  • Podcast
  • Login
  • Privacy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Refunds
  • Contact

Copyright 2021 Bar Exam Toolbox®™