• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Bar Exam Toolbox®

Get the tools you need for bar exam success

  • I Failed!
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
    • Writing Help: Essays/PT
    • MBE Help
    • Self-Study Program
    • Options – California
    • Options – UBE
    • Options – FYLSE (Baby Bar)
  • Bar Exam 101
  • About
  • Blog
  • Podcast
  • Login

Tackling MBE Hearsay Questions

May 29, 2019 By Natalie Holzaepfel Leave a Comment

Tackling MBE Hearsay QuestionsThe Multistate Bar Exam (MBE) contains a total of 175 scored multiple-choice questions. Of that 175, the bar examiners will present you with 25 evidence questions. Based on a review of the frequency of each type of evidence question, you’ll see the following breakdown within those 25 evidence questions:

  • Hearsay and circumstances of its admissibility: 6-7 questions
  • Presentation of evidence: 6-7 questions
  • Relevancy and reasons for excluding relevant evidence: 8-9 questions
  • Privileges and other policy exclusions: 2 questions
  • Writings, recordings, and photographs: 2 questions

As you can see, hearsay questions make up a large portion of the Evidence MBE questions you’ll be confronted with on exam day. Learn how to tackle these questions, and you could see a critical boost in your MBE score. Below are tips on how to approach hearsay questions.

1. The Overarching Approach

When approaching MBE questions, especially hearsay questions, a strong tactic is to think through the question as though you would be answering it on an essay. Thinking broadly about the answer will ensure you’ll fully analyze the entire scenario before jumping to a conclusion. Before looking at the answer choices, determine: a) whether you’re dealing with a hearsay question, b) whether the statement (or statements) are in fact hearsay, c) whether any exceptions apply, and d) whether you should consider the Confrontation Clause.

By doing this full analysis upfront, you won’t be tempted by the distractor answers that the bar examiners like to give you. Review the answer choices, and select the choice that provides the closest match to your analysis.

2. Identify whether you’re Dealing with a Hearsay Question

Whenever you see a question asking whether an out-of-court statement can be admitted, you are in the realm of hearsay. In any situation that could potentially involve hearsay, your first task is to determine whether or not the proffered statement is, in fact, hearsay. The bar examiners love to throw red herrings in, so be sure to do a thorough analysis on whether you’re dealing with hearsay.

Hearsay is an out-of-court statement offered for the truth of the matter asserted. Remember though–a statement can be spoken words or a nonverbal assertion. Out-of-court means that the declarant (the one providing the statement) did not make it while testifying at the current trial or hearing. When looking at whether the statement is offered for its “truth,” ask yourself if the statement is being admitted to prove its content.

In your analysis, don’t forget that the rule (FRE 801(d)) specifies two categories of statements as not hearsay if certain conditions are met: a declarant witness’s prior statement (FRE 801(d)(1)) and an opposing party’s statement (FRE 801(d)(2)). If the statement falls into either of these categories, the correct answer will reflect that the statement is not hearsay at all.

3. Determine whether any Exceptions Apply

Now that you’ve determined that you’re dealing with hearsay, check to see what, if any, hearsay exceptions apply. Many evidence questions offer an answer choice that says “inadmissible because it is hearsay.” While this could be correct, never stop there—most hearsay questions are also going to test the hearsay exceptions. 

There are many hearsay exceptions. In preparing for the exam, familiarize yourself with (if not hopefully memorize) all of them—including those exceptions that apply whether or not the witness is available. Some of the most common hearsay exceptions include present sense impression, excited utterance, statements made for a medical purpose or diagnosis, and the business records exception. When looking at those exceptions that apply only if the declarant is unavailable, common exceptions to remember include testimony under oath, dying declaration, and statements against interest.

Many MBE questions will test multiple hearsay exceptions within the same question. When that happens, there will often be answer choices that list one exception that applies, but not all of the exceptions that apply in a given situation. Don’t get fooled by these answer choices; look for the best answer choice that encompasses all of the exceptions that apply to a given situation.

4. Don’t forget the Confrontation Clause

Now that you’ve determined you’re working on a hearsay question and some exceptions may or may not apply, don’t forget to take one more step: determining if the Confrontation Clause bars the statement from being admitted. We won’t do a full analysis here but, in a nutshell, the Confrontation Clause requires that a defendant in a criminal case have an opportunity to cross-examine a witness when the witness’s statement is “testimonial”—meaning that the statement’s primary purpose is for use in a criminal prosecution.

The MBE can cause a lot of angst amongst bar exam takers, and hearsay questions make up a solid portion of what you’ll see on exam day. But by practicing, and implementing a strong approach, you’ll be able to improve your score.


Ready to pass the bar exam? Get the support and accountability you need with personalized one-on-one bar exam tutoring or one of our economical courses and workshops. We're here to help!


 

About Natalie Holzaepfel

Natalie is passionate about the law and recently founded a startup, Aliro Immigration, to increase access to immigration services. Prior to her startup, Natalie worked in New York as a white collar defense and internal investigations associate at Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton and in California at Perkins Coie. Natalie also clerked for Judge J. Clifford Wallace of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and for Judge James G. Carr of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio.

While attending The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law, Natalie served as a managing editor of the Ohio State Law Journal, interned in the Education Section of the Office of the Ohio Attorney General, and worked in the General Counsel’s Office at the Department of Housing and Urban Development. She also was a judicial extern to Judge Jeffrey Sutton of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Let us know you are not a spammer! * Time limit is exhausted. Please reload CAPTCHA.

Primary Sidebar

  • Podcast
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter

About Us

Want to pass the bar exam? Of course you do! We’re here to help. You’ll find lots of helpful free content at Bar Exam 101, in the Bar Exam Resource Hub, and on the Bar Exam Toolbox podcast. For more hands-on help, take a look at our courses and workshops and bar exam tutoring options. Please get in touch with any questions!

COVID-19 Updates

Please visit the COVID-19 updates page for the latest news on bar exam postponements.

Recent Posts

Podcasts to Tune into During Bar Prep

Podcasts to Tune into During Bar Prep

Let’s be honest— studying for the bar can feel like a drag sometimes. The great news is that there are learning methods out there to help you get … [Read More...] about Podcasts to Tune into During Bar Prep

Podcast Microphone

Podcast Episode 175: Listen and Learn — Inchoate Offenses (Criminal Law)

Welcome back to the Bar Exam Toolbox podcast! Today, we're focusing on Criminal Law, specifically inchoate offenses. This topic commonly appears on … [Read More...] about Podcast Episode 175: Listen and Learn — Inchoate Offenses (Criminal Law)

What the NCBE Looks for in a Passing Score

What the NCBE Looks for in a Passing Score

You recall studying for your law school exams with your professor’s thought process and priorities in mind. To do well in many law school courses, it … [Read More...] about What the NCBE Looks for in a Passing Score

Podcast Microphone

Podcast Episode 174: Listen and Learn — Privileges and Immunities Clause (Con Law)

Welcome back to the Bar Exam Toolbox podcast! Today, we're discussing how to identify and work through Privileges and Immunities Clause issues on the … [Read More...] about Podcast Episode 174: Listen and Learn — Privileges and Immunities Clause (Con Law)

Using Bar Exam Predictions to Guide or Not Guide Studying

Using Bar Exam Predictions to Guide or Not Guide Studying

To achieve bar exam success, it is essential to come up with a strategy that will work for you. This strategy may include focusing on the most highly … [Read More...] about Using Bar Exam Predictions to Guide or Not Guide Studying

Need to Pass the Bar Exam?

Sign up for our free weekly email with useful tips!

Footer

  • Podcast
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • I Failed!
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Bar Exam 101
  • About
  • Blog
  • Podcast
  • Login
  • Privacy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Refunds
  • Contact

Copyright 2022 Bar Exam Toolbox®™